Unparalleled access to a Bank Instrument Investment Program

Unique $35m entry, funds remain in your account.  

A Leveraged finance scheme with a Bank Instrument Investment Program or BIIP retains your funds in your B/A under your sole control. We refer to the BIIP, the less commonly used term for a Private Placement Program. This article explains there are three ways that a BIIP can work for founders of startups, who actually don’t have the required participation capital to enter:

1. 1. By incorporating a BIIP / PPP into your business plan can ensure you achieve your funding goals, while eliminating any risk for your funders.

2. 2. Creating a Joint Venture, whereby the Project owner introduces the funder, (owner of the capital) to the Program Manager, on the prearranged condition that the funder will either donate or invest a percentage of the gains, into your Project.

3. 3. By far easiest way, is to serve as a commissioned intermediary for the PPP (no broker chains allowed). Then simply introduce Investors, commissions are very sensible at percentage points of the investment, usually paid out fortnightly or monthly. 

The Rarified BIIP / PPP.

Normally only for an investor who has a clean and clear $100M USD, or since Nov 2023 an absolute minimum of $25M+ USD. The BIG news being from 22nd March 2026 for a limited time entry is possible with $35M. Simply submit the right document’s including a proof of funds, for your invite to prevail. Thats an opportunity to participate in a zero risk, high yield series of transactions. Suitable invitations only ever are given to investors who have the requisite capital, which  is both clean and clear of liens or encumbrances. It will preclude any investors already blacklisted. Please note, this is not a public market offering or does this fall inside legislation controlled by the Financial Services regulator.

BIIP | Bank Instrument Investment Program

The preferred type of BIIP also features a Reserve Account, or Non-Depletion Account. This is where the investor’s capital remains in their own account, and no block, lien, or encumbrance is ever placed on it, that’s it. Funds remain completely under the Investors full control who free to move the funds from their own account at any time, but this obviously would mean an instant exit from the program.

In this relationship, the investor basically never makes any investment at all. Therefore, we should not even call him or her the “client”, since the act of investing never needs to take place! Neither is the owner of the capital asked to make a loan, a donation, or any other kind of transfer of their funds to anyone else at any time. 

As no lien is ever placed on her funds, no encumbrance, no block, and no assignment, how is the funding generated? By special arrangement, a reflected line of credit is created at the Trading bank, said line of credit is used for buying and selling (trading) financial instruments which generates large profits. Further to this, the owner of the capital has no legal liability for what happens during the trading. The capital owner merely observes, and collect the profit payments. The yield from the program is very high. Payments are usually weekly or biweekly. Those familiar with this world know that the returns are unsurpassed. However we would rather you discuss the same with the Trader to learn the intimate details, naturally possible after proving the Fund and only hereafter, should you decide to proceed.

When any investor retains their capital in her own account at all times, under their own sole signatory control, neither sharing the control with anyone else, can it truly be said that the transaction is a zero risk, yet this is what’s on the table. For those who say that nothing is zero risk, then we can at least confirm it’s as close to zero as anything in the financial world can be. All because the client’s own capital stays in their own account, which must be $25M as a an absolute minimum (short term $35M+ entry possible). While a financial instrument of equal value and some liquidity may be an acceptable option, this is only possible to determine directly with the Trader. If this can be agreed, the capital or its equivalent in some acceptable form of acceptable security, both also always remain completely under the investors control.

So now let’s look at the three ways that are open to those looking to raise capital from a startup project or a extremely large project funding requirement can all use a BIIP.

1/ Incorporating the BIIP into one’s business plan, to make one’s venture a zero risk opportunity:

In this approach, the Investor would need to turn over control of his capital to the person or company that is directing the Project. Then the project director would commit this capital to a BIIP. As stated, traditionally an opportunity for $100m, whereas more recently an absolute minimum of $35M+ without moving your funds, yet currently entry is currently available for $35M+ without moving your funds (extremely unique and rare). The Project Director would normally guarantee that the investment is risk-free, and to make it so, they would commit 100% of the capital received to the type of investment that places no block, no lien, no encumbrance, and no assignment on the investor’s funds, all verifiable before contracts are signed.

The Program Manager in turn, will not allow this project director into the deal unless the capital is free and clear, so the capital cannot be borrowed. The original Investor would need to turn over complete control of the capital with no lien or encumbrance against it to the Project Owner. Thus, this first approach is the least likely to happen. Although it could happen if the investor has a high degree of trust in the project director, but we would say that is not very common place. 

If this scheme went forward, profits from the BIIP would fund both the project plus repay and still handsomely reward the investor and quickly. The exact percentages equally divided up between the parties.

PPP | Private Placement Program

2/ By creating a Joint Venture around a BIIP / PPP

In this approach, the startup director introduces the owner of the capital to the BIIP otherwise known as a PPP on the prearranged condition that the owner will either donate or invest a percentage of the gains into the startup or project. An example would be a 50/50 split. Here the investor stays in control of his principal capital at all times, and so his risk is zero. Plus he gets astronomical returns weekly or biweekly. By prior agreement, the investor turns over 50% of the gains to the project director who was seeking capital.

The idea of this being a donation, an outright grant, is not out of the question, because the investor’s returns will be so high. But even if the investor is not satisfied with such high returns, and wants equity in the project as well, that is possible too. It is all up to the two parties to negotiate.

The downside of this approach is the possibility of the investor breaching his contract.  After signing the contract, the project director would introduce the investor to the BIIP. Now he has fulfilled his side of the bargain. However, if the investor gets greedy after getting into the PPP and after receiving the returns, and decides to cut the project director out and violate the contract, this means things become unnecessarily complicated. 

3/ By serving as a commissioned intermediary for the BIIP / PPP: 

Here is where the project director doesn’t need to negotiate anything with any investor. Therefore doesn’t need a business plan to raise capital. They would only need the business plan for their own planning and organising purposes; rather than to present to potential investors. From simply introducing Ultra High Net Worth Investors to the opportunity, and if they thereafter proceed a serious commission will be earn’t. With this option, the Investor keeps 100% of their profits. In return, the intermediary receives commissions weekly or biweekly, basically every time the investor gets paid. Once the introducing intermediary has had one client earning, the word will spread, and more clients will step forward. Thus any intermediary’s commissions and income can quickly grow into high enough levels to approach what they were originally looking to raise, in order to fund their own project.

The great thing about this approach is, the commissions are the intermediaries own money, to do with it exactly as they wish. If funding a project or business is the desire, the intermediary can do so without turning over any equity or control in their project to any investor, which ultimately enables them to be self-funding. The downside is that the commissions will be a lot smaller than a big lump sum of capital from the possible approaches of items one and two above. Which means the process to fund therefore takes slightly longer before funding the project owners projects is possible. Yet the commissions the intermediary will earn are serious, therefore not to be scoffed at, so choose this option if you really want to succeed and control your own destiny. Always remember greed prevents most deals going through so take the advice we provide seriously if you wish to succeed.

For further information, see our other blog pages specifically around Private Placement Programs. We are pleased to inform you that a Tier 1 London bank is now available for clients who would like to enter a Trade Program (minimum 35m+ entry). For further details including CIS forms, please use the LinkedIn or Skype icons in the footer below to make contact.